Exhibitions to see in London this Summer

My current list of ‘must-see’ exhibitions in London is growing rapidly, to the point where I am worrying that there just aren’t enough hours in the day to see them all… I need a system. 

image 

Bob Mazzer: Underground - Howard Griffin Gallery, Shoreditch High Street - until 13 July 2014

The Glamour of Italian Fashion 1945 - 2014 - V&A, South Kensington - until 27 July 2014

Jenny Saville - Gagosian Gallery, Kings Cross - until 26 July 2014

Kenneth Clark: Looking for Civilisation - Tate Britain, Millbank - until 10 August 2014

Yvonne Rainer: Dance Works - Raven Row, Aldgate East - until 10 August 2014

Summer Exhibition 2014 - Royal Academy, Piccadilly - until 17 August 2014

Peter Hujar - Maureen Paley, Bethnal Green - until 24 August 2014

Marina Abramović:512 Hours - Serpentine Gallery, Kensington Gardens - until 25 August 2014

Making Colour - National Gallery, Trafalgar Square - until 7 September 2014

The Human Factor: The Figure in Contemporary Sculpture - Hayward Gallery, Southbank - until 7 September 2014

Journal - Institute of Contemporary Arts, Charing Cross - until 7 September 2014. 

Digital Revolution - Barbican Centre, Barbican - until 14 September 2014

BP Portrait Award 2014 - National Portrait Gallery, Trafalgar Square - until 21 September 2014

Radical Geometry - Royal Academy, Piccadilly - until 28 September 2014

Britain: One Hundred Years of the Human Story - The British Museum - until 28 September 2014

An Idiosyncratic A to Z of the Human Condition - Wellcome Collection - until 12 October 2014

Dennis Hopper: The Lost Album - Royal Academy, Piccadilly - until 19 October 2014

Malevich - Tate Modern, Bankside - until 26 October 2014

Virginia Woolf: Art, Life and Vision - National Portrait Gallery - until 26 October 2014

Louise Bourgeois: Works on Paper - Tate Modern, Bankside - until 12 April 2015

Bill Viola - St Paul’s Cathedral, St Paul’s - until 31 December 2015

My first published article

For a few weeks now, I’ve been working on an article about the significance of Marina Abramović and her institute, MAI, in developing the genre of performance art and its relevance in contemporary society. I have just had it published by the online journal I am currently working for as an editorial intern. It’s exciting to now be able to say I am a published writer and also for my first article to be in a journal that champions thinking, theory and invention across the fields of art, science and architecture. Please check it out.

http://thinking-in-practice.com/marina-abramovic-institute

Marina Abramović: 512 Hours

Marina Abramović began experimenting with durational performance art in the early 1970’s. Four decades years later she performed The Artists Is Present at the MoMA which drew in huge crowds including celebrity admirers. Criticised by some for “killing performance art”, Abramović has arguably entangled it with mainstream performing arts by collaborating with pop musicians and appearing on the cover of Vogue. Considering the potentially narcissistic nature of performance art this entanglement is hardly surprising as a 21st century development of the art form. Abramović believes, however, that performance art has a place in today’s culture. She argues that her work “gives back time”. It encourages concentration, away from technology, to get back into oneself. It is with this notion of the immaterial and purely bodily experience that she is performing 512 Hours at the Serpentine Gallery in London this summer. Abramović will spend eight hours a day, for six days a week in a space with strangers. The public will be asked to leave their belongings at the door and “become the performing body”. Abramović admits, however, that she is panicking about how cynical the British public can be. “They don’t want to be involved in anything that might embarrass them, or make fun of them. And that’s a huge challenge.”

11 June - 24 August 2014, The Serpentine Gallery, London.

A Career In The Arts - A Year On

This time last year, I was handing in my dissertation and preparing for the final exams of my undergrad degree. It was both a fulfilling and unnerving time. Many of my friends had the next stage of their life set-up and planned out. Studying for a masters, starting a grad scheme or going into employment. I, and a fair few others to be honest, were a little less prepared. The only concrete plans I had post-graduation were Glastonbury festival and moving back in with my parents. Career-wise I didn’t have a clue. All I knew is that I wanted to work in the arts and culture sector, but without much idea of doing what or where. I certainly wasn’t sure how I was going to get there, wherever ‘there’ was. 

A year on and things are still uncertain, but I’m realising that I am much closer to knowing what it is that I want to be doing and I’ve learnt a hell of a lot in the mean time. Here, I would like to share a few of the things I have learnt from beginning to build a career in the arts. Perhaps they will be useful tips for someone who is currently in the same situation I was in a year ago, or perhaps they will simply help to reassure you that it’s ok not to have your entire career sussed out the same day that you take a dissy selfie. 

  • 1. You are not going to land your dream job straight away

I spent days applying for jobs that had the word ‘curator’ in the title and got pretty much nowhere. Because I didn’t know what the kind of job was that I wanted to apply for I naively picked out the ones that sounded glamorous and super-arty. Naturally I didn’t get a look in because it is competitive out there, in case no one has told you already. I decided to be more focused and think about the kind of experiences and skills I had developed over my time at uni. I applied for a paid internship at Tate in events co-ordination because I had experience organising fundraising events for RAG so had plenty to talk about in the application and interview. It was a dream opportunity and I felt privileged to have been offered the role, but I tell you now, it’s because I changed my approach to thinking realistically about what I could do.

  • 2. Know how to sell yourself

After finishing my internship at Tate, I spent a lot of time filling out job applications and going to interviews. I cannot emphasise enough how important it is to be able to talk about your skills, experiences and knowledge in a way that demonstrates that you have many valuable things to offer. At the end of the day, being the “chosen one” comes down to you being more desirable that someone else and you only have a small space to convince the employer of that. It is definitely something that comes with practice. By the tenth job application or fourth interview I felt that sense of “nailed it” relief. I think some of that practice came from doing the York Award as that was basically a dry-run of the job app and interview process without the stakes. So get practicing! 

  • 3. Find part-time work that relates to your desired industry

Between graduating and starting my internship at Tate I worked as a Front of House Assistant at Lakeside Arts Centre in Nottingham. It was the flexible job I went back to during university holidays and was still there for me when I returned after graduating, which I am very grateful for. It bought me some time in the career game because it meant that I was not only earning, but also getting relevant experience, as well as the opportunities to develop useful skills. Instead of feeling stuck waiting for the ‘career’ job to take off, it was really rewarding having the part-time job to keep me busy and allow me to spend time in the right kind of environment with fellow arty people. 

  • 4. Use websites that are specific to the industry

Knowing where to look for work in the arts and culture sector is one of the biggest challenges of getting started. Luckily there are a handful of specialist sites that are the holy grail of job hunting. They are great because they advertise jobs at all levels and even give you the option to search by the area, salary and type of contract, saving you a lot of time trawling through job adverts. My favourites are the Arts Council England jobs website (http://www.artsjobs.org.uk/) and the University of Leicester Museum Studies jobs desk (http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/JobsDesk)

  • 5. Sign up for a temping agency

It sucks being stuck in the cycle of being rejected from jobs because you don’t have enough experience, but not being able to get the opportunities to gain experience. I have recently discovered that temping is a good way to break that. Sign up for a recruitment agency, or a couple. They look at your CV and put you forward for roles they think you would be suitable for. You can even specify what kind of work you want to do, including the kind of client. I signed up for Val Wade Temping in London and was placed in the Marketing Department at Southbank Centre for four weeks. 

  • 6. Keep in the loop with the art world

It can be difficult to stay enamoured of the art world when you are getting rejections from jobs or simply out of practice with studying. It is really important to not get out of the habit of going to exhibitions, reading art journals and blogs and attending lectures and talks, just because you are not studying it any more. This is so because, yes, you must know what is going on in the art world and being able to answer the question “so which exhibitions have you been to recently?” in an interview without lying, but more importantly because you have to keep motivated and keep that art history mind ticking over. People work in this industry because they are passionate about it so it’s essential to keep that passion alive yourself. 

  • 7. Use your friends as a support network but don’t compare yourself to them

My friends have played many indispensable roles throughout my career development. They have been there to talk it out with, bounce ideas off and even proof-read my applications. They have been a bottomless pit of encouragement and advice, and I like to think I’ve done the same for them. In your early twenties, your friends are your support network. However, constantly having the “so what are you doing now?” conversation with every person you know from university can be a little overwhelming. My friends all seem to be moving at different paces, doing different things that are “successful” to them. It’s impossible to compare yourself to them and not feel like you’ve missed out or fallen behind on something, whether it’s the number of figures in their salary, the big name company they now work for or the cool places they’ve traveled to. You have to remind yourself not to compare what you are doing to them because we’re all taking slightly different paths to where we want to get to. 

So that’s my (rather long) list of things I have learnt over the past year in terms of building a career in the arts. Please feel more than welcome to drop me a message if you want to chat. Alternatively, if you still feel like you need more encouraging words of wisdom, listen closely to Greg Dyke’s speech at graduation. He is a guy who knows. 

Shimmering, Shining, Vomiting, Glitter

I am going to this symposium tomorrow! It’s going to be intense for my lazy little brain as it has been at least five months since I’ve engaged with long hours of lectures but I’m really looking forward to it. I’ve felt inspired by the exhibition on display Nottingham Contemporary celebrating the work of artistic collective Asco and been to a few talks and film screenings in connection with it, so I’m hoping tomorrow will be fascinating and rewarding. Having a read through the list of speakers and the titles of the talks, I can tell a lot of it will be quite new to me but it definitely sounds right up my street.

"This two day symposium seeks to explore the meaning of disgust across a range of practices, including art, literature, film and popular culture, activism, spatial practice and performance, from the twentieth century to the present day."

Regeneración 2, no. 4, 1974 – 75, p.31, drawing by Patssi Valdez. Courtesy of the UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Library

'VIOLINS, VIOLENCE, SILENCE' - Bruce Nauman @ York St Marys

I recently visited the latest exhibition in a series of contemporary art installations at York St Marys, ‘ARTIST ROOMS: Bruce Nauman’. In partnership with Arts Council England and the Art Fund, York Museums Trust presents a selection of works by American conceptual artist Bruce Nauman in a beautiful, historic architectural space. Walking around the exhibition I was thrilled to see the range of Nauman’s works that were featured, from his large cast iron sculpture to his video works and most iconic neon sign installations. It felt like a rare treat to see the work of a contemporary artist in the city of York, especially in an important public space. However, as I was having a quick flick through the comments book, I noticed other visitors didn’t exactly have the same reaction. Some felt this wasn’t the kind of work they wanted to see here, some confessed that they didn’t enjoy it because they couldn’t appreciate the point of the work and some wrote that they felt it shouldn’t be considered art at all. 

One of the comments that stood out to me read ‘Violence - what is all this obsession with violence?!’ I reflected back on the exhibition I had just walked around and contemplated what it was about these works on display that created an apparent overwhelming theme of violence. One of the most prominent works on display is a neon tubing piece titled ‘VIOLINS VIOLENCE SILENCE’, 1981-2. The words ‘VIOLENCE’, ‘VIOLINS’ and ‘SILENCE’ in neon bright shades of yellow, pink and white intersect and overlap to form a triangular shape hung on the central back wall of the church interior. The word ‘violence’ takes prominence in the work as it becomes apparent that the beginning and end of the supporting words combine to make the ‘violence’. Whether the material quality of the neon helps to emphasise the significance of the word ‘violence’  could be debated. The harsh flicker and buzzing sound of the neon sign affects the senses in a violent manner, yet the iridescent glow in warm hues softens the word. What is undeniably clear is the detachment of the word from its context. The viewer is aware of the uneasy connotation of the word but is not subjected to experiencing or witnessing any form of violence as part of the work.

image

This is in opposition to a video piece on display around the corner to the neon work titled ‘Violent Incident: Man-Woman Segment’, 1986. In this piece the viewer observes a male and female performer become physically violent towards each other. The performers actions become more erratic and over-the-top until the ‘violence’ seems like something from a cartoon sequence and less aggressive or vicious. In the work, the ‘violence’ in the title is mirrored by ‘violence’ taking place in the work. Nauman has interpreted the word and recreated a form of violence that takes on a comical appearance but is none-the-less something the audience may associate with the word. In the neon piece however, the interpretation of ‘violence’ is left to the viewer to produce. It seems that the person who has made the comment about an “obsession with violence” has walked away from the video piece with a set idea about violence in their head and continued to view the works with this in mind. Nauman’s work has an inherent violent quality to them perhaps. This is something the sculptor and installation artist Cornelia Parker believes about her work and sculptural artworks in general. The process of making sculpture and installations can be violent in itself, she believes - the cutting, sawing, slicing, carving, assembling, disassembling actions that take place, for example. Parker has made work such as ‘Words That Define Gravity’, 1992, where she engages with the violent act of throwing words over a cliff edge. In some works an action associated with violence is reduced to a word, and that word alone can still have powerful associations with the viewer, who then makes the assumption that the artist is “obsessed with violence” for example. 

image

Above: Bruce Nauman, ‘VIOLINS, VIOLENCE, SILENCE’, 1981-2.

Below: Cornelia Parker, ‘Words That Define Gravity’, 1992.